I use Google Chrome now because several places no longer support FF.
Yes, overall everything works fine but if watching diner water movie and you switch tabs the cinetheater will pause until you come back to the rab.
If you stay too long on another tab, the game will session out an you will have to close the game tab and go back to the lobby tab to start a new game with new session
You can have two browsers installed.
It's more likely a YT change than Ikariam change.
Tested on Firefox and it works the same as before.
So far, all is well. I've made it to 4 towns which means I have a town for each of the initial resources.
This also means it's time to graveyard, so I set my towns to gold mode and I'm going to graveyard them. I might graveyard a few times for more warps, but we'll see. I should also come back to a huge pile of gold for more trade ships, too.
If I do graveyard for more warps, I'll probably do a pattern of "play during the 7d premium and then graveyard".
Interestingly, it appears he's peaked at around 9m offensive points or so for now.
But that's kind of expected. You only get to destroy the general bank once lol
Display More
Display More
Right, so IP sharing request exists for nothing. Supervision and regulation are important factors in all areas. Given the size of the game, they should supervise and regulate it. However, I have nothing against those who use Hades to get marble, as long as you follow the rules, of course.
People complain about everything, and they always will.
IP sharing doesn't exit for nothing. If you think you can just get away with not using the IP sharing treaty, make two accounts and trade or attack yourself and see how quickly you get banned.
You dont have a lot of experience is this game do you? They use vpn which was banned once to stop this. Please stop commenting if you dont know what you are talking about.
I have plenty of experience, but there's a huge difference between stating "You can ignore the IP sharing treaty" and "It's trivial to get two or more different IP addresses to pretend to be different players."
I'm also extremely doubtful about the amount of illegal multis because of my own experience with the game. I taught my grandparents how to play the game and all they did once they had 4 towns was log on and donate to the sawmill because they were happy to help their grandson lol.
I also had my whole World of Warcraft guild helping me, too, and based on your criteria for illegal multis, they would've fit the bill because all they did was log on and donate wood (once they had 4-6 established towns), build warehouses, list stuff on the trading post, or buy wood from me at the max price.
They use vpn and blow right by the go's so please stop commenting. it's been exploited for years since they allowed it.
This contradicts your entire statement of how they're coordinating it openly in Perseus' Discord. That implies, by default, that they aren't illegal multis.
You can't prove that they're using VPNs, if you could, you'd do what I've been telling you: Report them to the GOs.
A general bank does not imply someone was an illegal multi. A general bank coming out of vmode, being unable to sell troops, and needing to shed troops quickly attacking someone with the Hades miracle active isn't a violation, either.
Display MoreDisplay MoreDisplay MoreDisplay Moreusing illegal multi's is against the rules and badidol knows it but chooses to igmore it. Some of us have been playing this game and fighting over ten years.We know the exploits but some of us dont cheat.
badidol nor the GOs choose to ignore it. The issue is that it's difficult to get definitive proof.
Again, suspecting someone has an illegal multi and proving someone is an illegal multi are two different things and badidol, the GOs, etc. require proof otherwise it'll simply be overturned on appeal to SGOs.
Nothing you've reported in this threat suggests illegal multis, at best, it suggests a possible pushing violation.
Right, so IP sharing request exists for nothing. Supervision and regulation are important factors in all areas. Given the size of the game, they should supervise and regulate it. However, I have nothing against those who use Hades to get marble, as long as you follow the rules, of course.
People complain about everything, and they always will.
IP sharing doesn't exit for nothing. If you think you can just get away with not using the IP sharing treaty, make two accounts and trade or attack yourself and see how quickly you get banned.
You dont have a lot of experience is this game do you? They use vpn which was banned once to stop this. Please stop commenting if you dont know what you are talking about.
I have plenty of experience, but there's a huge difference between stating "You can ignore the IP sharing treaty" and "It's trivial to get two or more different IP addresses to pretend to be different players."
I'm also extremely doubtful about the amount of illegal multis because of my own experience with the game. I taught my grandparents how to play the game and all they did once they had 4 towns was log on and donate to the sawmill because they were happy to help their grandson lol.
I also had my whole World of Warcraft guild helping me, too, and based on your criteria for illegal multis, they would've fit the bill because all they did was log on and donate wood (once they had 4-6 established towns), build warehouses, list stuff on the trading post, or buy wood from me at the max price.
Display MoreDisplay MoreDisplay MoreDisplay Moreit's documented right here. You only have to look at the top offence and defence scores to see what they are doing. I bet that guy is at 10 million offence score in 12 hours. They found a way to get rid of their gen banks and scoop hundreds of million in marble if not billions. Badidol knows who they are, they are all big alliances and on the ikariam discord but ya...I wont mention names. All the high point players have dropped tags just to do this.
What exactly is the violation you're concerned about?
Troop destruction using the Hades' miracle is currently a supported feature of the game and isn't against the current rule set. If anything, they'll stealth change Hades to be only the defender's units that turn into marble.
The player you've alleged this against did the opposite, the lower point player (he has around 1m points) dropped the alliance tag to attack someone. Again, nothing about this seems to be a violation of the rules so far.
Using a general bank was never against the rules; butchering a general bank into marble isn't currently against the rules either.
Attacking someone with the intention of losing while they're using the Hades miracle might be against the rules if the attacker has lower points than the attacked, but that gets a lot more ambiguous as you'd need to prove collusion for pushing.
using illegal multi's is against the rules and badidol knows it but chooses to igmore it. Some of us have been playing this game and fighting over ten years.We know the exploits but some of us dont cheat.
badidol nor the GOs choose to ignore it. The issue is that it's difficult to get definitive proof.
Again, suspecting someone has an illegal multi and proving someone is an illegal multi are two different things and badidol, the GOs, etc. require proof otherwise it'll simply be overturned on appeal to SGOs.
Nothing you've reported in this threat suggests illegal multis, at best, it suggests a possible pushing violation.
Right, so IP sharing request exists for nothing. Supervision and regulation are important factors in all areas. Given the size of the game, they should supervise and regulate it. However, I have nothing against those who use Hades to get marble, as long as you follow the rules, of course.
People complain about everything, and they always will.
IP sharing doesn't exit for nothing. If you think you can just get away with not using the IP sharing treaty, make two accounts and trade or attack yourself and see how quickly you get banned.
Display MoreDisplay MoreDisplay MoreDisplay MoreDisplay MoreWhat exactly is the violation you're concerned about?
Troop destruction using the Hades' miracle is currently a supported feature of the game and isn't against the current rule set. If anything, they'll stealth change Hades to be only the defender's units that turn into marble.
The player you've alleged this against did the opposite, the lower point player (he has around 1m points) dropped the alliance tag to attack someone. Again, nothing about this seems to be a violation of the rules so far.
Using a general bank was never against the rules; butchering a general bank into marble isn't currently against the rules either.
Attacking someone with the intention of losing while they're using the Hades miracle might be against the rules if the attacker has lower points than the attacked, but that gets a lot more ambiguous as you'd need to prove collusion for pushing.
using illegal multi's is against the rules and badidol knows it but chooses to igmore it. Some of us have been playing this game and fighting over ten years.We know the exploits but some of us dont cheat.
badidol nor the GOs choose to ignore it. The issue is that it's difficult to get definitive proof.
Again, suspecting someone has an illegal multi and proving someone is an illegal multi are two different things and badidol, the GOs, etc. require proof otherwise it'll simply be overturned on appeal to SGOs.
Nothing you've reported in this threat suggests illegal multis, at best, it suggests a possible pushing violation.
Right, so IP sharing request exists for nothing. Supervision and regulation are important factors in all areas. Given the size of the game, they should supervise and regulate it. However, I have nothing against those who use Hades to get marble, as long as you follow the rules, of course.
People complain about everything, and they always will.
That's why they dont ip share their multi's. This guy gained 10 million offence points in 4 days which must be a record for this game. They will ambro convert the marble to crystal and soon with upgrades will be invincible. So now the bullies of the game cant be beat and all you can do is shut everything down, hide or v.mode like lots are doing.
If you don't IP share your multi and attack or interact with your other account, the system automatically detects it and forwards it to the GOs.
That's the easiest way to get banned quickly. I dare you to try it and find out how fast it is.
Hi, there is a guy on our server who is clearly multiaccounting. We reported him, but I want to ask how long it takes GOs to respond, and if they are actually willing to ban a player that is for example top 1 on server?
On one server I play on, the top account was banned for 6+ months.
Display MoreDisplay MoreDisplay MoreDisplay Moreusing illegal multi's is against the rules and badidol knows it but chooses to igmore it. Some of us have been playing this game and fighting over ten years.We know the exploits but some of us dont cheat.
badidol nor the GOs choose to ignore it. The issue is that it's difficult to get definitive proof.
Again, suspecting someone has an illegal multi and proving someone is an illegal multi are two different things and badidol, the GOs, etc. require proof otherwise it'll simply be overturned on appeal to SGOs.
Nothing you've reported in this threat suggests illegal multis, at best, it suggests a possible pushing violation.
Anyone who has played this game longer then a few years can see whats going on. You can see it organized right on the open perseus discord channel. They dont even try to hide it.
If it's "organized in the Perseus discord channel" that implies that there's at least 2 people coordinating it and thus it doesn't involve an illegal multi because it's more than one player.
Again, take screenshots, post receipts.
That does leave open the possibility of pushing, but I'm not familiar with the rules regarding Hades and pushing.
But if you suspect pushing, you can use the "report player" in game.There's a lot more then 2 people doing it. Mainly guys with gen banks.
So this guy has got 9 million offence points in 3 days. Now anyone who fights knows this could take months if not a year of fighting to achieve.
Again, Crow, what are you accusing them off? If someone built a general bank, and GF made general banks useless, they are going to use them to grind up offensive points.
Currently, there's no rule against attacking someone who is using Hades, and on top of that, this is a short term problem as the general banks empty themselves out.
I will say it would make a lot more sense for Hades to only work for the defender's units.
If you think there's a pushing violation, it should be very easy to determine so just report the players.
The account from yesterday is just grinding down his troops, he's already down to 750k generals.
Display MoreDisplay MoreDisplay MoreDisplay Moreit's documented right here. You only have to look at the top offence and defence scores to see what they are doing. I bet that guy is at 10 million offence score in 12 hours. They found a way to get rid of their gen banks and scoop hundreds of million in marble if not billions. Badidol knows who they are, they are all big alliances and on the ikariam discord but ya...I wont mention names. All the high point players have dropped tags just to do this.
What exactly is the violation you're concerned about?
Troop destruction using the Hades' miracle is currently a supported feature of the game and isn't against the current rule set. If anything, they'll stealth change Hades to be only the defender's units that turn into marble.
The player you've alleged this against did the opposite, the lower point player (he has around 1m points) dropped the alliance tag to attack someone. Again, nothing about this seems to be a violation of the rules so far.
Using a general bank was never against the rules; butchering a general bank into marble isn't currently against the rules either.
Attacking someone with the intention of losing while they're using the Hades miracle might be against the rules if the attacker has lower points than the attacked, but that gets a lot more ambiguous as you'd need to prove collusion for pushing.
using illegal multi's is against the rules and badidol knows it but chooses to igmore it. Some of us have been playing this game and fighting over ten years.We know the exploits but some of us dont cheat.
badidol nor the GOs choose to ignore it. The issue is that it's difficult to get definitive proof.
Again, suspecting someone has an illegal multi and proving someone is an illegal multi are two different things and badidol, the GOs, etc. require proof otherwise it'll simply be overturned on appeal to SGOs.
Nothing you've reported in this threat suggests illegal multis, at best, it suggests a possible pushing violation.
Anyone who has played this game longer then a few years can see whats going on. You can see it organized right on the open perseus discord channel. They dont even try to hide it.
If it's "organized in the Perseus discord channel" that implies that there's at least 2 people coordinating it and thus it doesn't involve an illegal multi because it's more than one player.
Again, take screenshots, post receipts.
That does leave open the possibility of pushing, but I'm not familiar with the rules regarding Hades and pushing.
But if you suspect pushing, you can use the "report player" in game.
Give the defending side a greater advantage?
The attacking side only has the power of surprise, it suffers a disadvantage in everything else.
Unfortunately, it's clear from your comments that you don't understand and that you're full of *snip*. There's nothing wrong with that, it's a free world. You've said enough *snip*today, I'll let it go..
Yes, the defender should have an even greater advantage. Why shouldn't it?
Again, your suggestion of reducing the hp/attack of gyros is effectively the same as giving the balloons additional armor. You just don't like that additional armor benefits everyone more.
I just always side with favoring the defender as they have to react to what the attacker is doing and more defensive options keeps players around longer.
After using Firefox containers I find it still closes Ikariam
Here's a guide on container tabs and how to use them:
I think this is exactly the point: when you don't know how something works, you can't give good advice.
I know how the battle system works and all of those suggestions fix the problem.
If balloons attack first, balloons can't ever be rendered ineffective by gyros.
If balloons have more armor, gyros need to get more attack upgrades to defeat all of the enemies balloons.
Display MoreDisplay MoreCurrently, air combat is not balanced on land, if you haven't developed much, you don't know the combat tricks, it's a shame to explain it to you.
His combat ability is inversely proportional to the number of comments he writes. Forget him.
You are right: air combat is not balanced on land. And it's been that way for a long time, though, so I guess GF doesn't give a damn.
LOL. Always with the insults.
I know how the combat system works, but thanks. Again, I do feel like the game should favor the defender more which is why I suggested balloons shooting before gyros.
Telling the truth is not an insult: you have no combat skill whatsoever.
And then you keep insisting on these bizarre theories of yoursā¦ the combat system has many problems, and thatās a fact.
That GF doesnāt care is another fact, but that doesn't make the combat system any better or more fun.
What bizarre theories? The issue is that in the current system, if gyros have enough attack upgrades, balloons don't attack at all.
My suggestions are: give the balloons more armor (which forces gyros to get more attack upgrades) or let the balloons attack first, both of which solve the problem, albeit in different ways.
Personally, I'd feel like it'd be even more interesting if combat went something like 25% of balloons attack, 25% of gyros attack (which may target balloons that already attacked), 25% of balloons attack, 25% of gyros attack, 25% of balloons attack, 25% of gyros attack, but that isn't currently supported in the combat system.
I can see that as introducing more variance than most players would tolerate.
Display MoreAs a final thought. I don't think adding armor to the base stats of balloons is a good idea, because then even players who don't know the mechanics will feel an advantage. Since armor helps a lot, it's always constant in avoiding the wave. The health can to exhaust.
There are two things could play with.
1. Increase the health of balloons (buff)
2. Damage and health reduction of gyroscopes (nerf)
Well, the first one would be more obvious and easier to adjust. I don't think there would be much adjustment needed, they're not completely useless, but there's no point in using them vs almost the same upgrade.
The purpose of adding base armor to the balloons is because it increases the number of attack researches the gyros have to do to gap you so they can one shot all of your balloons.
Giving the balloons 10 base armor means that gyros would need to have +7 your balloon defense instead of the current +5 to one shot all of them. This also fixes the cost tables, too, to balance out the costs a bit better.
Nerfing gyro damage/hp does the same thing, effectively. For every 5 attack and hp the gyro loses, it's equivalent to giving the balloons 5 armor.
Again, combat is currently designed to be gyro versus gyro and you have to exhaust your opponents gyros before sending your balloons in.
I'd still say the more elegant solution is to allow balloons to shoot before gyros because it rewards active play.
Currently, air combat is not balanced on land, if you haven't developed much, you don't know the combat tricks, it's a shame to explain it to you.
His combat ability is inversely proportional to the number of comments he writes. Forget him.
You are right: air combat is not balanced on land. And it's been that way for a long time, though, so I guess GF doesn't give a damn.
LOL. Always with the insults.
I know how the combat system works, but thanks. Again, I do feel like the game should favor the defender more which is why I suggested balloons shooting before gyros.
I see that makes your statement a little clearer, which is unfortunately terrible in its current form, because it makes units and buildings useless.
I think your suggestion is not a good approach, because then the balloon would always fire 30 cannons, and it would be unbalanced anyway.
It would be enough to increase the base health a little, and the balloon would immediately be more usable for deployment in more situations, since it would also be usable in the old system.
It would make combat more interesting because you couldn't just send your mortars until you got rid of all of the balloons, but I doubt it'd be popular.
I don't believe the solution is more HP, either, if anything, it'd be making the armor upgrade for balloons cheaper or giving balloons some base armor.
So, according to your argument, it's pointless to keep balloons. It's pointless to rotate steam giants. It's pointless to increase the wall, because in the air it's going to be giro vs giro anyway. When the opponent has 6000 giro and you don't have enough action points to deploy sharks, what's the point of these units in the game?
Based on your modest approach, you fight with hoplites and gyros.
You're not taking advantage of the real advantage of balloons that you should have in a battle, and you have no idea about it.
Currently, air combat is not balanced on land, if you haven't developed much, you don't know the combat tricks, it's a shame to explain it to you..
I am pointing out that in the current state of the game, it's a gyro versus gyro world. I did not offer any solution to the problem.
To me, the most obvious solution, is to change the firing order so balloons fire before gyros.
