Posts by chauhan989

Quote from NMadalin

The math is in fact correct. The way it's displayed, it's confusing, but not wrong.

The Help section shows the cost with research reduction taken into account. So 6591657 wood is actually only 86% from the base cost (which is 7664717). If you then apply all the calculation (meaning 36% from 7664717) you get 2759298, basically what shows on the upgrade tab. That's why you can't calculate 50% from the help section cost.

The "logic" behind this, is that the research reduction applies to all towns, while the building reduction applies only to that specific town, so when you have no reduction building, you will pay the price displayed in the Help section

Already double-checked what you said. Correct 100%. Thanks so much.

Hello, I would like to ask about a possible issue or misunderstanding regarding Town Wall upgrade costs.

I took screenshots directly from the game.

My Carpenter’s Workshop and Architect’s Office are both already maxed at level 50.

According to the building information shown in-game, the resource cost reduction should leave me paying only 36% of the original cost.

Based on the numbers shown for upgrading the Town Wall from level 48 to 49, the expected cost should be approximately:

• 2,372,997 wood
• 2,512,314 marble

However, the actual amount I had to pay was:

• 2,759,298 wood
• 2,921,295 marble

This is significantly higher than what the displayed 36% reduction would suggest.

Did I misunderstand something, or is there another mechanic affecting Town Wall upgrade costs that I may have overlooked?

Images are attached

I guess that up until now, there hasn't been any effect beyond 50%. However, your total score will increase. If enemies target your town, this is an option for you to prevent your resources from being pillaged

Hi, can someone please explain what happened?

A few days ago, I was attacked and pillaged by this player.

Today, I did the same thing to him — attacked and pillaged — but then I got this message:

I thought that once a town is attacked and pillaged, the cultural goods are supposed to be gone.

So why did this happen to me?

3. Pushing

It is not allowed to gain an advantage at the expense of weaker players. A player is considered weaker if his total highscore is lower than that of the accused.

Clarifications:

• Does this rule prevent players from attacking or pillaging those with lower total scores?
• If pillaging is allowed, is there a daily limit on the number of times it can be done?
• How does this rule apply if two alliances engage in conflict?

Quote from Draxo

No matter what the purpose is, it is NOT ALLOWED to share the account credentials with other people. Plain and simple. And currently, there is no feature to buy a gift for your friend. Send him the money outside of Gameforge to let him to buy ambrosia in their game account.

Okay, okay, it's cool, man. Please help me to close this thread.

But to be honest, firstly, I understand what Gameforge is afraid of—account hacking, money hacking, and the potential troubles from lawsuits. And I also clearly stated that Vietnamese bank cards cannot be used for transactions in this game. People in other countries can do it? Congratulations, but my friend is not so lucky, unfortunately.

Secondly, if I were cheating, it's understandable for them to be worried. But if I'm actually topping up for my friend with my hard-earned money, and now you are banning that, okay, you're rich. $49.99 is nothing to you (actually, it's not a big deal for me either), but it is a meaningful gift for my friend. If you reject the money, I will support that. Simply by stopping the top-ups.

Take it easy, thank you for replying. Don't take what I said too seriously. It's just a few words exchanged, I still play this game normally, I still respect you, and I thank Gameforge for creating an interesting game.

Respectfully

I understand that money is a sensitive issue. Companies will minimize risks, but it would be very strange for a gaming company not to create ways to increase income (transparently, not through cheating, hacking, or stealing credits). For example, I could top up my own account and then send a code or something similar, which he could enter to receive ambrosia. As I said, the money is mine, and I want to give my friend a gift in the game. My friend cannot use his bank card in Vietnam for this purpose. That is why I decided to use my bank card in the US to pay for him. It would be much easier if I could transfer money to him and he could pay with his own account, but the problem is that bank cards in Vietnam cannot be used for transactions in this game.

Anyway, the money is mine. If Gameforge doesn't want it, then I'll simply stop gifting. The money won't go into their pockets.

And banning my account? Banning an account that has purchased a considerable amount of money and wants to top up for my friend? They must be crazy. Is this how they treat customers who put money into their pockets?

Hello everyone, especially GM and Admin,

I have been playing this game for over 12 years now, and I have a question. I want to give my gaming friend a gift by purchasing a $49.99 ambrosia package for him. I have talked to him, and he agreed. However, when I logged into his account on my laptop and entered my credit card information to pay, the game informed me that "We were unable to authorize your card." I have double-checked the card information many times and even called Chase bank (a U.S. bank). After confirming that I am the cardholder, they said they could not influence this game.

I also tried logging into the game on an iPhone, but on the phone, the game reported that the username or password was incorrect.

There is currently an event with an +80% bonus when purchasing ambrosia. Please GM and Admin, help. The bank card is mine, and I am voluntarily gifting my friend the package.

If any additional information is needed, please inbox me privately.

I do not ask for the BAN. But at least admins need to do something to request them change their city names. A game is just a game, sometime people get mad but it is not a reason to allow them to insult other people or countries.

Quote from Username

Shit is govno and not gavno

If not sure, use google translate, 10 seconds and you know for sure.

By the way first name Scott [pronounce skot] means sort of asshole in south slavic languages.

Are we insulting people by calling them with their first name?

Display More

Thanks for your replying,

I use google translation and both of those words have the same translation into English based on google.
I do not use Slavic language, but then please help me to translate "Vietnamgavno" or "gavno Vietnam" into English for all admins and mods to consider.

Hi Administrators and Moderators,

I have found some players who have named their cities in the game as "gavno Vietnam" or "vietnamgavno". As my knowledge, in Russian or Slavic, the word "gavno" means "shit" in English. Clearly, this is an critical insult to my homeland.

I request the game operators take actions to prevent this shameful incident.

The reward must be increased. It makes no sense and also is useless when you keep winning the battle but get not enough back.

Hello everyone,

As I've been noticed, after each time we attack barbarian, the numbers of barbarian troops are increased but the reward is not. More challenge but also more reward proportional, isn't it?

With this reward, I cannot build back my troops.

1. Increase hourly production. (for example: now +1/worker, (suggest +2/worker)) (Why? by updating, the amount of resources to upgrade is needed A LOT, it is impossible to upgrade max)
2. I do agree with the idea to have new kinds of research futures. (but don't increase limit of research future, 25 is enough)

3. Increase merchant ships (or Phoenician merchant ship)
4. Open more slots in battlefields (for example: now there are 7 slots of front line, (suggest 9 or 11 slots of front line)). (scale up the battles)